The Supreme Court intervened in the NEET-UG 2024 dispute, garnering media attention when it demanded that IIT Delhi clarify a difficult exam question. The National Testing Agency (NTA) awarded marks for two distinct answers to a single question, and students challenged that decision. This ruling is in reaction to those objections. Let us dissect the recent events for your benefit.
Highlights of the Supreme Court Hearing
- The Supreme Court scheduled a hearing on Monday to discuss the NEET-UG 2024 exam.
- The court instructed the IIT Delhi director to put up a group of three subject matter experts by noon on Tuesday during the session.
- Their mission is to find the right response to the disputed question.
Why Did This Come About?
Regarding the NTA’s decision to give marks for two distinct solutions to a single question, some students have expressed complaints. They are seeking judicial assistance because they contend that this decision has adversely affected their results.
Supreme Court Hearing Today
Today was anticipated to see the Supreme Court issue a landmark decision regarding NEET. However during the hearing, a number of concerns and queries were brought up, and the decision was delayed. The matter, which has been pending for a number of days, has been carefully examined by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s bench. Though the hearing will resume tomorrow, the CJI had previously indicated that today would be an important date for resolving these concerns.
Important court rulings
The responsibility of identifying the right response to NEET question 19 has been assigned to IIT Delhi by the Supreme Court. It has been advised that the director of IIT Delhi appoints three experts to a committee and that the committee report its conclusions by July 23 at noon.
Concerns Regarding NTA’s Choice
Concerns Regarding NTA’s Choice
The NTA’s choice to give full marks for two distinct solutions to a question is a major source of disagreement. The Supreme Court voiced concern, pointing out that 400,000 students stood to gain from this ruling. All attorneys requesting a retest of the NEET have been instructed by the CJI to send their written submissions to this address via email.
The Court Rejects NTA’s Decision-Making Process
Chief Justice Chandrachud questioned whether pupils ought to use the NCERT textbooks from the previous edition or the current one. It was affirmed by the Solicitor General that the new edition ought to be adhered to. This prompted the CJI to argue that it was against the regulations to give both answers full marks and to criticize the verdict. The court stressed that the right response ought to align with the latest edition of the NCERT.
Can a question be removed?
Regarding a question with unclear options, a substantial argument was made. Confusion over the possibilities led a student with a 711 grade to decide not to tackle the question. Students who did attempt it, however, were later given full marks by the NTA. The student’s attorney argued that unclear questions ought to be eliminated by citing a prior Supreme Court decision. This was recognized by the CJI as a compelling argument.
Requesting a Re-Examination
Advocate Hegde made a petition for a NEET retest, arguing that the first exam ought to be viewed as a preliminary round and that a second, larger exam needs to be administered. It was just and reasonable, he claimed, for there to be another exam. A prior case in which the Supreme Court canceled a test because certain candidates had received undue benefits was cited to support this appeal.
Was the 2024 NEET fair?
Advocate Hegde questioned the NTA’s sincerity as a test agency and harshly condemned it. He contended that there was a possibility of organized wrongdoing because of the way the NTA handled the exam, casting doubt on its impartiality. He made it clear that the exam’s fairness to students had been undermined.
Uncertainty Concerning the Test
Senior Advocate Hegde noted that many international universities, in addition to Indian medical institutes, need to pass the NEET exam as a qualification. He highlighted the unreliability of a test with 61 top scorers and questioned if all 1.3 million pupils had been adequately assessed.
Next Up: What?
At a minimum, the qualified candidates ought to be invited to retake the exam, according to Attorney Hooda, if a re-NEET isn’t determined. It is estimated that 1.3 million kids would be impacted.
Position of the Supreme Court on Cancelling the Whole Exam
Once all the arguments were heard, the Supreme Court declared that calling off the entire exam was not a workable alternative. They agreed, meanwhile, that mistakes and systemic failures need to be taken very seriously.
Volume of Mistakes in NEET
A few of kids at particular centers had exceptionally high marks, indicating possible misconduct, as Advocate Hooda pointed out. More doubts regarding the legitimacy of the test were raised when he presented examples from different places, including situations in which school coordinators were also coaching center owners.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court is vital to maintaining fairness and openness in the NEET-UG 2024 debate, which is still actively developing. Millions of students and the education community are still hoping for a fair outcome as we wait for the expert committee’s report from IIT Delhi. Check back soon for additional developments on this unfolding tale.